Hansard debates
Search Hansard
Search help
|
|
|||||||
LOCAL GOVERNMENT (DEMOCRATIC REFORM) BILL
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
30 October 2003
Second Reading
INGRAM
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
We have just had a discussion about that today: the disclosure provisions that were contained in the 2002 Electoral Act were used to draw up the disclosure provisions in the Local Government (Democratic Reform) Bill, so we place a higher standard of disclosure on local government than we do on ourselves. The hypocrisy of that really demands some explaining. Is there more corruption in local government? I suppose I should not ask that question here, but is there more chance for people in local government to misbehave or be influenced by donations? I am not saying we should not have disclosure provisions - I think we should - but we should have them as well for state elections, because they are equally as ordinary. I would like to thank Geoffrey Goode from the Proportional Representation Society of Australia for sending his views on Robson rotation. That is something that should have been included in this because it breaks down any potential for tickets under proportional representation, and it also breaks down some of the party involvement. I know everyone around here says there is limited party involvement, but I think most people who are close to local government recognise that there is. I conclude by saying local government is the most important level of government, which may sound strange coming from a state member, but it is closest to the community. Local government deals directly with the community on many issues and often on a day-to-day basis. Rural areas in particular do most of their negotiation and dealing through local government, so local government is absolutely critical to rural areas. People have to make sure they get the best people on local government to put their views forward because of the difficulties placed on a lot of our communities. It is a good bill. It presents a few challenges, and probably a few issues in it need more addressing, but overall it should be supported by the house.